Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
DOI 10.1007/s00202-009-0114-1
ORIGINAL PAPER
Electromagnetic and mechanical design aspects of a high-speed
solid-rotor induction machine with no separate copper electric
circuit in the megawatt range
Juha Pyrhönen · Janne Nerg · Aki Mikkola ·
Jussi Sopanen · Tuomo Aho
Received: 5 August 2008 / Accepted: 14 April 2009 / Published online: 30 April 2009
© Springer-Verlag 2009
Abstract The most crucial electro-magnetic and mechanical design aspects of an integrated electrical-motor–gas-compressor system in high speed and high power operation are
presented. The electric motor type considered is a solid-rotor
induction motor with properties of which are particularly well
suited in high-speed operation. The effect of the electro-magnetic material properties of the solid rotor core material on
the performance of the machine is discussed. Guidelines to
improve the performance of the solid-rotor induction motor
are given. Thermal design aspects of a solid-rotor induction
motor are presented. The mechanical properties of a solid
rotor are discussed. Bearing arrangements as well as the rotor
dynamics of an integrated system are presented.
Keywords Solid rotor induction motor · Solid rotor
materials · Electromagnetic design · Thermal design ·
Mechanical design · Bearing arrangements · Rotor dynamics
Abbreviations
FEM Finite element method
IGCT Integrated gate commutated thyristor
IGBT Insulated gate bipolar transistor
SFD
Squeeze film damper
AMB Active magnetic bearing
BW
Backward whirling
FW
Forward whirling
1 Introduction
High-speed applications such as large gas compressors, large
vacuum systems, large waste-water treatment plant blowers
J. Pyrhönen · J. Nerg (B) · A. Mikkola · J. Sopanen · T. Aho
South Karelia University of Applied Sciences, Lappeenranta, Finland
e-mail: nerg@lut.fi
etc. are often operated by traditional, existing technology,
where gas turbines are utilized as primary movers to drive
the compressors. No gear is needed between the turbine and
the compressor, and therefore these constructions are called
direct drives. An alternative is an indirect drive, where a
speed-increasing gear driven by a traditional electric motor
is used instead. However, advances in high-speed electric
motor technology and especially in power electronic converters have made a direct electrical drive an interesting
approach. Modern commercially available power electronic
converters can provide power up to several megawatts at
frequencies up to 200–500 Hz. Three-level IGCT converters
may reach 200 Hz and multi-level IGBT converters 500 Hz
or more. By using this kind of a power source, the rotational speed of an electrical machine can achieve the value
of 12,000–30,000 min−1 . It appears to be more straightforward to design a simple high-speed electromechanical energy
conversion device than for instance a complicated gas turbine
with a number of rotating components, labyrinth seals and the
related lubrication problems, thermal stresses, etc. However,
mechanical, thermal, and material constraints of the electrical machine restrict the maximum power and the speed of
direct electrical drives.
An integrated electric-motor–gas-compressor system has
a rotating component that converts the electric energy to
mechanical energy. In some cases, it is even possible to attach
the working machine directly on the same shaft with the electric motor. In such a case, the motor bearings are used as
integrated machine bearings. Such a construction eliminates
the need for different ancillary systems such as the gear, the
lubrication system for the gear, and especially in the case
of an integrated gas compressor, the shaft seal. Furthermore,
savings are obtained in volume, losses, and costs.
It is noteworthy that the overall performance of an integrated electric-motor–gas-compressor system is defined by
123
36
the operation of individual components such as the motor or
the compressor as well as the interactions of components.
For this reason, an integrated approach for high speeds has
a crucial impact on the electric machine design, where all
the design problems are strongly interacting with each other.
The electromagnetic, mechanical, and thermal design of the
whole drive system must be coupled in the preliminary design
stage. This is not only a technical problem, but also requires
management consideration. The design of an integrated
electric-motor–gas-compressor system is a highly demanding task, which requires a designer to possess a wide knowledge of all the engineering disciplines associated with the
performance of the system. To find an optimal design, different engineering teams should co-operate with each other. The
co-operation is productive if the physical requirements of the
electromagnetic, mechanical, and thermal design aspects are
understood and taken into account.
The objective of this study is to introduce the most crucial design aspects that should be examined when an integrated electric-motor–gas-compressor system is considered.
This will be accomplished by explaining the requirements
of the electromagnetic and mechanical performance of integrated systems. The electrical machine type addressed in this
study is a solid-rotor induction motor with no rotor windings. Such a motor is particularly well suited for a highspeed, high-power application, where mechanical aspects are
of major importance.
2 Machine types for high-speed energy conversion
In general, the electromagnetic design of an electric motor
can be assumed to be independent of the machine speed,
while the mechanical properties of the drive system usually
dominate the design. There is an increasing interest in using
permanent magnet technology in large high-speed applications. The mechanical design aspects are, however, challenging when permanent magnet machines are built for large
peripheral speeds [1–3].
An induction machine is traditionally manufactured of
laminations and a die-cast or soldered squirrel cage. This kind
of a construction is mechanically undetermined as it contains
hundreds of individual bodies, which may move with respect
to each other. For this reason, such a motor usually has no
deterministic balance. Instead, the balancing of the rotor varies with respect to the rotating speed. It is noteworthy that the
assembled stacks of laminations increase the weight of the
rotor, while their capability to carry bending or shear loading
is insignificant. Consequently, a laminated rotor is vulnerable to mechanical vibration, which easily leads to problems at
high speeds. The mechanical strength of electrical steels limits the surface speeds of laminated rotors to about 200 m/s. At
higher speeds the construction may not be used at all. In order
123
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
to overcome problems associated with the mechanical design
of a laminated rotor, a solid rotor with a squirrel cage can be
used. Manufacturing of such a rotor is, however, expensive.
The solid rotor with a squirrel cage still suffers from the problem that the rotor consists of several individual bodies. As
different materials are used in the squirrel cage and the rotor
body, loads caused by heat expansion and centrifugal forces
require careful considerations on the mechanical design of
the rotor. In some cases, the squirrel cage is welded using for
instance diffusion welding to the rotor core. This sets high
requirements for the quality of the welding process leading
to high manufacturing expenses.
The pure solid-rotor induction machine with no separate
rotor winding is, inherently, the most robust type of electric motors that can be used in high-speed applications. The
main aspect from the electromagnetic design point of view
is the loss balance in the design. In higher-speed machines,
the power density of the machine is considerably higher compared with traditional totally enclosed machines and, furthermore, the losses caused by the cooling gas friction increase
in the power of three as the angular velocity of the rotor
increases. Hence, the machine designer has to concentrate
on motor cooling and minimization of motor losses. Despite
the fact that the rotor is made of one solid piece of steel,
its mechanical strength and dynamics may become limiting
factors in the design. The design of a high-speed motor is a
fully coupled engineering problem.
3 Solid-rotor induction motor
The solid-rotor induction machine is mechanically robust and
resists high angular velocities, but it may not be an excellent motor type from the electromagnetic point of view. The
electromagnetic problems related to this motor type are rotor
related. When manufacturing the rotor of a single piece of
steel, there are no well-conducting windings in the rotor, and
therefore, compared for instance with copper-cage rotors, the
rotor has to be large enough to produce torque.
3.1 Working principle
At synchronous speed, there are no fundamental currents
flowing in the rotor of an induction motor, and the flux lines
travel directly through the rotor. Some rotor slip frequency
is needed to induce voltages and currents in the rotor. The
induced rotor axial electric field strength E0 in induction
machines is directly proportional to the normal air-gap magnetic field strength H n0 on the rotor surface and the rotor
fundamental slip frequency f slip1 as
E0 ∼
= f slip1 H n0 .
(1)
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
37
According to the electromagnetic fundamentals, when a flux
is penetrating a solid conductor, the surface impedance Zs
adopts in linear and simple cases the form
E0 (0, t)
E0 (0, t)
=
Zs =
J s (t)
n × H n0 (t)
ωslip µ
1+ j
=
= (1 + j)
,
δσ
2σ
(2)
where E0 is the axial electric field at the surface of the solid
rotor, n is the unit vector normal to the surface, H n0 is the normal magnetic field strength at the surface of the solid rotor,
J s is the surface current in A/m, δ is the depth of penetration,
µ is the material permeability, ωslip is the angular frequency
of the penetrating field, σ is the material conductivity, and
t is time. Consequently, the (1 + j) factor in (2) defines that
the active and reactive parts of the surface impedance are
equal, and therefore, there is a temporal phase shift of 45◦
between the electric field strength and the surface current.
For a non-saturating rotor, this produces a power factor of
cos ϕrotor = √1 .
2
Iron, however, saturates and according to Agarwal’s limiting non-linear theory [4], the rotor power factor angle of
a fully saturated smooth rotor is 26.6◦ , which gives a rotor
power factor of cos ϕrotor = 0.894. In practice, a smooth
rotor power factor is somewhat lower. On the other hand,
slitting the rotor surface with axial slits improves the rotor
power factor. According to 2D FEM calculations, a slitted
core produces a power factor angle of about 22◦ . The end
regions seem to follow Agarwal’s theory. Together with the
air gap phenomena, the whole solid-rotor motor power factor
typically lies in the range of cos ϕ = 0.7.
According to Maxwell’s tension theory, the magnetic field
strength between objects in vacuum creates a tension σ F on
the object surfaces, which can be written as
σF =
1
2
,
µ0 Hn0
2
(3)
where µ0 is the permeability of vacuum.
The tension term can be divided into its normal σ Fn and
tangential σ Ftan components as follows
σ Fn
1
2
,
= µ0 Hn2 − Htan
2
σ F tan = µ0 Hn Htan .
(4)
(5)
In (4) and (5), Hn and Htan are the normal and tangential
components of the magnetic field strength, respectively. In
terms of torque production, the tangential component of the
tension σ F tan is of significance. In the case of a rotor, the total
torque exerted on the rotor can be obtained by integrating the
stress tensor over a cylinder that confines the rotor. The surface current density Js creates tangential field strength in an
electric machine. The local tangential tension in an air gap
can be expressed as follows
σ F tan = µ0 Hn Htan = µ0 Hn Js = Bn Js .
(6)
The equation expresses a local time-dependent value for
the tangential stress when the values of the normal flux density Bn and the surface current Js are known. Assuming
sinusoidal distributions, an average stress force F tan can be
obtained by integrating the stress σ F tan over the rotor surface
S = 2πrl as follows,
F tan = σ F tan S =
1
B̂n Jˆs S cos ϕrotor ,
2
(7)
where B̂n and Jˆs are the peak values of magnetic flux density
and surface current, respectively. The resulting average force
applies at the distance of the rotor radius r from the shaft and,
hence, the torque can be written as
Tem = F tan r = B̂n Jˆs πr 2 l cos ϕrotor = B̂n Jˆs V cos ϕrotor ,
(8)
where V is the volume of the rotor.
Finally, the torque of the solid rotor can be simplified as
follows
f rslip1
cos ϕrotor V,
(9)
Tem = B̂n Jˆs cos ϕrotor V ∼
= c B̂n
Z
where c is a utilization factor. At low slip values, the rotor
resistivity dominates while the impedance Z is mainly determined by the rotor resistance. For this reason, the power factor angle remains in a smooth saturable solid rotor within the
range of 27–30◦ . In slitted rotors, the angle may be somewhat lower. Accordingly, the torque increases as the slip
frequency increases, and the torque decreases as the rotor
surface impedance increases. A solid steel rotor, typically,
has a relatively high slip frequency f slip1 because the rotor
material has a high resistivity compared with traditional rotor
conductive materials, aluminium and copper.
The losses of the rotor are directly proportional to the slip
of the rotor. According to the induction motor theory, the
per-unit slip s of the rotor can be defined as a ratio of the rotor
slip frequency to the stator supply frequency f s as follows
s=
f rslip1
s − r
ωs − ωr
=
=
.
fs
s
ωs
(10)
where s is the synchronous rotation angular speed of the
machine corresponding to the supply frequency f s and r
is the loaded rotor angular speed. In (10), ωs and ωr are
the corresponding electrical angular frequencies. Taking the
number of pole pairs p into account, the following relations
are valid
ωs − ωr
.
(11)
ωs = ps ; ωr = pr ; f rslip1 =
2π
If the fundamental air-gap power Pδ1 is the fundamental
power flowing across the machine air gap from the stator
123
38
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
Table 1 Induction rotor fundamental efficiency as a function of per unit slip for a p = 1 motor
f s /Hz
f rslip1 /Hz
T, per unit
Per unit slip
Rotor loss, per unit
50
5
1
0.10
1.11
0.1
100
5
1
0.05
2.22
0.1
150
5
1
0.033
3.33
200
5
1
0.025
4.44
250
5
1
0.02
300
5
1
350
5
400
450
500
Speed/min−1
Output power, per unit
η1rotor
2700
1
90
5700
2.11
95
0.1
8700
3.22
96.7
0.1
11700
4.33
97.5
5.55
0.1
14700
5.44
98
0.017
6.67
0.1
17700
6.56
98.3
1
0.014
7.78
0.1
20700
7.67
98.6
5
1
0.0125
8.88
0.1
23700
8.77
98.75
5
1
0.011
9.99
0.1
26700
9.88
98.9
5
1
0.01
11.11
0.1
29700
10.99
99
Pδ,per unit
The rotor slip frequency is kept at a constant value of f rslip1 = 5 Hz. It can be seen that when the supply frequency increases, the per unit slip
decreases and the rotor fundamental efficiency increases
to the rotor, the fundamental frequency caused losses of the
rotor Pr,loss1 are directly proportional to the per unit slip of
the rotor as follows
Pr,loss1 = s Pδ1 .
winding factor kw1 , the effective air gap length δef , and the
number of turns in series Ns as follows
L m = µ0
(12)
According to (9), a non-zero slip frequency f rslip1 is
needed in the rotor to produce torque. Slip frequency also
leads to a per unit slip that defines the rotor fundamental efficiency η1rotor , in which the eddy-current losses within the
rotor surface, i.e. the rotor surface losses, the rotor hysteresis losses, and the mechanical and gas friction losses are
neglected. The rotor fundamental efficiency can be calculated as
2mτ p ′
l (kw1 Ns )2 .
π 2 pδef
(14)
Since
1
τp ∼
=
p
(15)
the magnetizing inductance taking the stator magnetic circuit
parts and the air gap into account is inversely proportional to
the square of the pole pair number p. Hence, in order to get
acceptable power factors p = 1 should, if possible, be used
in solid-rotor high-speed induction machines.
3.2 Rotor materials of a solid-rotor induction machine
η1rotor
Pδ1 − Pr,loss1
Pδ1 − s Pδ1
=
=
= 1 − s.
Pδ1
Pδ1
(13)
An example according to Table 1 clarifies this matter. In
the example, the effects of supply frequencies are studied by
assuming that the desired rated torque is produced using a
rotor fundamental slip frequency of f rslip1 = 5 Hz.
Table 1 shows that even though the rotor slip frequency
f rslip1 on a solid rotor is large, the rotor fundamental efficiency in a high-speed machine can be high. However, it
must be kept in mind that with a fixed rotor slip frequency,
the per unit slip decreases remarkably when the stator frequency is increased. As a conclusion, an induction machine
is at its best when the machine speed is high.
The solid rotor itself produces a low power factor because
the field pattern created in the material acts as a magnetic
and electric conductor. For this reason, the simplest version
of the solid rotor—the smooth solid rotor—may not be used
in any high-power applications. The rotating field machine
magnetizing inductance L m depends on the phase number m,
the pole pitch τ p, the effective core length l ′ , the fundamental
123
To produce high torque, the solid rotor material has to meet
two main electromagnetic properties: (1) The rotor conductivity should be as large as possible and (2) the rotor material
saturation flux density should be as high as possible. Of these
two properties, conductivity plays a more important role in
terms of torque production. It is noteworthy that the initial
permeability of the material is not significant here. In fact,
to obtain a considerable effect on the torque production, the
initial permeability of the solid rotor material should be as
low as 50 [5]. In this section, as a base reference, a 120 kW
two-pole, 170 Hz induction motor equipped with a slitted
solid iron rotor is used. The main parameters of the reference motor are presented in Table 2. Its synchronous speed is
10,200 min−1 , rated slip 1%, efficiency 0.93, cos φ = 0.61,
and the rated torque 110 Nm. The rated current of the motor
at 400 V (line-to-line voltage) supply is 300 A. The number
of turns per phase is 16. These values are used as reference
values when comparing rotors made of different materials.
As the main objective of this chapter is to illustrate the
effect of different electromagnetic material properties of the
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
39
2.00
Table 2 Main parameters of the reference motor
3
Number of stator slots
48
Stator outer diameter
400 mm
Stator bore diameter
200 mm
Active stator stack length
280 mm
Air-gap length
2.5 mm
Rotor length
340 mm
Rotor slit depth
40 mm
Number of rotor slits
34
Rated voltage (line voltage)
230 V
Rated phase current
300 A
Stator winding connection
Delta
Rated frequency
170 Hz
Rated output power
120 kW
rotor material on the performance characteristics of a solidrotor induction motor, a two-dimensional, non-linear timestepping finite-element analysis was selected; in other words,
magnetic saturation, skin effect, and motion of the rotor with
respect to the stator are taken into account in the analysis.
A single-valued magnetization curve was used to model the
stator and the rotor. The circuit equations were applied to
model the sinusoidal power supply (i.e. the inverter-caused
current ripple was neglected) and to take the effect of the
stator end fields into account in the calculations. In the twodimensional finite element calculations, the rotor end effects
were taken into account by modifying the rotor equivalent
resistivity by the Russel end-factor [6]. Special attention was
paid to the quality of the finite element mesh on the outer
layers of the solid rotor, where the maximum element size
was less than one third of the depth of penetration. All the
finite element calculations were performed using Flux-2DTM
software package from CEDRAT.
Figure 1 indicates the effect of the rotor material conductivity on the torque production when the saturation flux
density corresponds to the value of iron, Bsat = 2 T.
Figure 2 illustrates the importance of the saturation flux
density of the rotor material to the rotor torque production.
According to the result of Fig. 2, the saturation flux density of the rotor material above the value of 1.25 T seems
to have an insignificant effect on the torque. The rated slip
remains at the value of 0.67 in materials with Bsat > 1.25 T.
Below this value the rated slip and the rotor losses increase
dramatically.
As the rotor core is acting as a current- and magnetic-fluxcarrying circuit in a solid rotor, a poor power factor of the
motor cannot be avoided. However, as we can see in Fig. 3,
a high saturation flux density of the rotor material improves
1.75
Electromagnetic torque pu
1
Number of phases
20 µΩcm
30 µΩcm
40 µΩcm
50 µΩcm
60 µΩcm
80 µΩcm
1.50
1.25
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
Slip [%]
Fig. 1 Electromagnetic torque of the solid-rotor induction machine as
a function of slip. The rotor resistivity is used as a parameter. The saturation flux density of all the materials is 2 T and the initial relative
permeability was set to a constant value of 2,000. We can see that a
high conductivity, i.e. a low resistivity, leads to a low slip and a high
rotor fundamental efficiency
2.00
Saturation flux density
1.75
Electromagnetic torque pu
Number of pole pairs
Resistivity
10 µΩcm
1.50
1.25
2.25 T
2.00 T
1.75 T
1.50 T
1.25 T
1.00 T
0.50 T
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
Slip [%]
Fig. 2 Electromagnetic torque of the solid-rotor induction machine as
a function of slip. The saturation magnetic flux density is used as a
parameter. The resistivity of all the materials is 30 µcm and the initial
relative permeability was set to a constant value of 2,000
the power factor. This phenomenon is emphasized when the
motor is operated at a low slip.
The most important rotor material property, in addition
to the fact that the rotor has to be ferromagnetic, is a high
conductivity. The resistivity of pure iron at the temperature
of 20◦ C is about 9.8 µ cm, which is about four times as
high as that of aluminum. A problem from the viewpoint
of mechanical strength is that a highly conductive iron may
not contain any compounds that are important with respect
to the material strength. Adding almost any compound in
steel remarkably increases its resistivity. Fig. 4 illustrates the
behaviour of iron conductivity with different alloys.
123
Power factor
40
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
0.75
0.70
0.65
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.00
Saturation flux density
2.25 T
2.00 T
1.75 T
1.50 T
1.25 T
1.00 T
0.50 T
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
Slip [%]
Fig. 3 Power factor of a two-pole solid-rotor induction machine as
a function of slip. The saturation magnetic flux density is used as a
parameter. The resistivity of all the materials is 30 µ cm and the initial relative permeability was set to a constant value of 2,000. Similarly
as in electromagnetic torque production, the reasonable saturation flux
density value is above 1.25 T
In electrical engineering applications, silicon and aluminium are added in electrical sheets to maximize the resistivity
of the material. As a result, the eddy current losses in the
material are minimized. According to Fig. 4, copper could be
added in iron to produce an appropriate solid rotor material.
Adding 5–6% of copper lowers the saturation flux density of
the material to about 1.7 T, which is adequate for the rotor
application as explained above. The strength of the alloy is
significantly improved when compared with pure iron. The
problem associated with the copper–iron alloy is that copper
is considered an impurity of steel, and therefore only a few, if
any, manufacturers are interested in producing copper iron.
The compound of copper requires vacuum casting, which is
not widely available. For these reasons, the rotor has to be
manufactured using a commercial steel with a low amount of
impurities and compounding additives. It is noteworthy that
the traditional Fe52 (S355J0/EN 10025) has a room-temperature resistivity of about 25 µcm.
3.3 Improving the performance of solid-rotor induction
machine
ρ /µΩ cm
80
70
Si
60
Al
50
40
30
Ni
20
Co
10
0
Cu
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
compounding agent, % per weight
Fig. 4 Effect of silicon, aluminium, nickel, cobalt, and copper alloying
on the resistivity of iron [7]
Fig. 5 Flux lines and flux
density distribution of a 170 Hz
smooth solid-rotor induction
motor at a slip of 1.0%. We can
see that the flux penetrates only
the rotor surface even though the
per unit slip is low
123
The performance of the simplest rotor, viz. a smooth solidsteel rotor, can be analyzed with the finite element approach.
Fig. 5 shows the flux pattern in a smooth solid-iron rotor.
The motor parameters are the same as presented in Table 2
except that the rotor is smooth. As it can be seen in the figure,
the flux does not penetrate very deep into the smooth rotor.
The current density is also concentrated on the surface of the
rotor while the resistance of the rotor is large. Such a rotor
requires a large slip to produce torque thereby resulting in a
low efficiency.
To improve the performance of the solid rotor, flux penetration into the solid rotor material should be improved.
A method to improve the flux penetration into the rotor is to
slit the rotor surface as shown in Fig. 6. The parameters of the
motor are presented in Table 2. At this point, the coupling of
the electromagnetic design with mechanical design becomes
obvious, since slitting weakens the mechanical strength of the
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
41
Fig. 6 Flux lines and flux
density distribution of a 170 Hz
slitted solid-rotor induction
motor at a per unit slip of 1.0%.
Slitting of the solid rotor surface
remarkably improves the flux
penetration into the rotor
Fig. 7 Electromagnetic torque of a 170 Hz solid-rotor induction motor
as a function of per unit slip. The rotor slitting depth, presented as a ratio
of the rotor radius, is used as a parameter. The best torque is reached
when the slitting depth is 60% of the rotor radius. The rated per unit
slip of the motor with 60% deep slits is 0.8%. The rotor frequency is
hence 1.36 Hz. The smooth solid rotor produces only 38% of the rated
torque at this slip
rotor as it will be explained in Sect. 5. Due to the mechanical
aspects, the maximum slit depth, in practice, is approximately
one half of the radius of the solid rotor [8].
Figure 7 shows the considerable effect of slitting on the
torque production of a solid rotor construction.
3.4 Additional losses in solid-rotor induction machines
The solid rotor surface is sensitive to the air gap harmonics,
which may generate a remarkable amount of additional losses
on the rotor surface. The distributed winding system of the
stator, stator-slot-caused permeance harmonics, and possible
time harmonics caused by an inverter supply are sources of
spatial harmonics.
The designer has, however, several methods that may be
used in minimizing the amount of rotor surface losses. The
spatial harmonics may be minimized by using stator winding
Fig. 8 Two-pole 9 MW, 200 Hz, solid rotor losses at the rated slip of
s = 1.2% with different resistivities of the rotor coating material. We can
see that the coating with a resistivity of about two times that of the core
material or more reduces the total rotor losses
arrangements that produce a minimum amount of harmonics. For example, chording of the stator winding effectively
reduces the lower space harmonics in the air-gap flux. The
permeance harmonics may be minimized by intelligent
magnetic circuit design. The air gap time harmonics may be
minimized for instance by using high switching frequency
inverters and filtering.
From the rotor material point of view, there are two alternatives to minimize the rotor surface additional losses caused
by the harmonics. It is either possible to use a well-conducting non-magnetic coating or a high-permeability low-conducting material. The material allows the harmonics attenuate
before entering the rotor core and acts like a mirror while it
does not let the harmonics penetrate the rotor core, where
additional losses are likely to occur. Figure 8 indicates the
results for the rotor coating alternatives when a 9 MW
12,000 min−1 rotor is coated with different materials having
a saturation flux density of 1 T and a relative permeability of
50. The main parameters of the 9 MW solid-rotor induction
motor are presented in Table 3.
123
42
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
Table 3 Main parameters of 9 MW solid-rotor induction motor with a
slitted solid iron rotor
Number of poles
2
Number of phases
3
Rated output power
9000 kW
Rated frequency
200 Hz
Stator outer diameter
750 mm
Stator bore diameter
335 mm
Active stator length
850 mm
Rotor outer diameter
325 mm
Number of stator slots
48
Number of rotor slits
28
Width of a rotor slit
4 mm
Depth of a rotor slit
60 mm
Figure 9 shows the coating principle.
The coating may be manufactured for instance by using a
stainless ferromagnetic tube, which may be welded to every
tooth and the ends. This procedure also significantly improves the mechanical strength of the rotor.
4 Thermal design of a solid-rotor induction machine
In electrical machines, the design of heat transfer is of equal
importance as the electromagnetic design of the machine,
since the thermal rise of the machine eventually decides the
output power of the machine. When high-speed machines are
considered, the thermal aspects are emphasized. This is due
to the high power density and the increased friction losses.
Usually, high-speed machines are cooled by forced convection using open circuit air-cooling. The cooling gas friction
loss Pfr in the air gap can be written as [9]
Pfr = k1 C T ρπ ω3r 4 l,
Fig. 9 Coating principle
studied in Fig. 8. The core
material is slitted, and on the
surface of the rotor, there is a
uniform 3–5 mm thick
ferromagnetic coating. The
coating smoothens the rotor
surface. A smooth surface also
reduces the friction losses.
A highly resistive ferromagnetic
coating also reduces the total
rotor losses
123
(16)
where C T is the torque coefficient, ρ is the mass density
of the fluid, ω is the angular velocity of the rotor, r is the
rotor radius, l is the length of the rotor, and k1 is the roughness coefficient, the value of which is 1.0 for a smooth rotor
and typically 2–4 for axially slitted rotors. The effect of the
rotor slitting is twofold: the friction losses increase, whereas
the slitting intensifies the cooling of the rotor because of the
increased turbulence level and heat transfer surface.
In axial cooling, the gas flows through the air-gap, which is
generally the case in high-speed machines, and thus the friction losses increase. The rotor forces the cooling gas into a
tangential movement and, accordingly, some power is needed
to accelerate the cooling gas. If the radial air-gap length is
small compared with the rotor radius, the axial flow power
loss Pfr,a can be approximated as follows
Pfr,a = k2 qm u 2 ,
(17)
where k2 is the velocity factor, qm is the mass flow rate of
the cooling gas, and u is the peripheral speed of the rotor. It
is important to note that the gas friction loss Pfr turns into
heat in the air gap, but the mass flow rate dependent loss
component Pfr,a turns into heat mostly after the air gap, i.e.
in the end-winding space. As shown in Eq. (16), the friction loss is proportional to the third power of the angular
velocity of the rotor and to the fourth power of the rotor
radius. The mass flow rate dependent loss component is proportional to the square of the peripheral speed of the rotor and
directly proportional to the mass flow rate of the cooling fluid,
respectively. The desired angular velocity, peripheral speed,
and the rotor radius are results from the electromagnetic and
mechanical analyses. Thus, the only parameter which can be
utilized in decreasing the axial temperature gradient of the
machine, and subsequently in minimizing the power of the
auxiliary blower, is the axial length of the cooling gas flow
path. The most common solution is the utilization of radial
cooling ducts. This can be accomplished by dividing the stator stack into two parts, and the cooling fluid is blown inside
Coating
Slitted solid-rotor
Slitted solid-rotor
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
43
Fig. 10 Cooling channels of a solid-rotor induction motor with a slitted
solid rotor
Table 4 Main parameters of 430 kW solid-rotor induction motor with
a slitted solid iron rotor
Number of poles
2
Number of phases
3
Rated output power
430 kW
Rated frequency
170 Hz
Stator outer diameter
391 mm
Stator bore diameter
242 mm
Active stator length
310 mm
Rotor outer diameter
237 mm
Number of stator slots
60
Number of rotor slits
40
Width of a rotor slit
2.5 mm
Depth of a rotor slit
50 mm
the machine through a radial channel. The cooling fluid flow
is divided into two equal parts in the air-gap area, both eliminating half of the rotor and friction losses of the machine.
A typical cooling system of a high-speed machine is illustrated in Fig. 10.
The utilization of lumped parameters, i.e. thermal resistance networks, has proven to be an accurate enough calculation tool for the thermal analysis of solid-rotor induction
motors [9,10]. In the complete thermal resistance network
model of a solid-rotor induction motor, both the axial and
radial heat transfer inside the machine, the presence of the
contact transition layers, and the heating of the cooling air are
taken into account. As an example of the lumped-parameterbased thermal analysis of a solid-rotor induction motor, let us
consider a case where the end-winding temperature is minimized by blowing a part of the cooling air directly to the endwindings through additional bores in the frame. The analyzed
machine was a three-phase two-pole 430 kW 170 Hz solidrotor induction motor with a slitted solid rotor. The stator
stack was divided into two sections, between which there
is a radial cooling duct. The rotor was equipped with copper end rings. The main parameters of the analyzed 430 kW
solid-rotor induction motor are shown in Table 4.
Fig. 11 Effect of the additional end-winding cooling on the temperatures of a 450 kW, high-speed induction machine. The end-winding
temperature can be effectively decreased by blowing a part of the total
volume rate of the cooling fluid directly to the end-windings, The results
are calculated applying a lumped-parameter-based thermal analysis.
The incoming fluid temperature is 35◦ C
The temperature distribution of the motor analyzed was
calculated at the nominal operation point, i.e. the torque
was 405 Nm and the rotational speed of the rotor was
10,090 min−1 . The calculated temperatures of the end-windings, the coils in the slots, the rotor teeth, and the rotor end
using two different cooling fluid flow paths are illustrated
in Fig. 11. The volume rate of the cooling air entering the
machine was 0.367 m3 /s in both cases. The first, left-hand
bars in the figure correspond to the case in which all the
cooling fluid was flowing through the radial cooling duct to
the air-gap, and the second, right-hand bars correspond to
the case in which 30% of the total volume rate of the cooling
fluid was blown directly to the end-windings; in other words,
70% of the total volume rate of the cooling fluid was flowing
through the radial cooling duct. Because there are two cooling
ducts for the end-windings, the volume rate of the cooling air
blown directly to the drive and non-drive end end-windings
was 0.055 m3 /s. The results are calculated with a lumpedparameter-based thermal analysis in steady-state conditions.
The thermal resistance network used consists of 15 nodes.
The details of the thermal model are reported by the authors
in [10].
The calculation results, in which a part of the cooling
air was blown directly to the end windings, were verified by
measuring the average value of the end-winding temperature,
the temperature of the coils in the slots with Pt100 sensors.
The temperature of the inlet air as well as the volumetric air
flows through the radial cooling duct and the end-winding
bores were measured. The temperatures of the rotor end ring
and at the bottom of one rotor teeth were measured with a
thermometer after the machine had stopped. A comparison
123
44
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
Table 5 Comparison of the calculated and measured temperatures of
the 430 kW solid-rotor induction motor in degrees celsius
Location
Measured
Calculated
Coils in slots
87
88
End-winding
122
123
Rotor teeth
88
90
Rotor end ring
90
92
of the calculated and measured temperatures in the case of
additional end-winding cooling is presented in Table 5.
5 Mechanical design of a solid-rotor motor
In the mechanical design of a solid-rotor motor, a number
of static and dynamics issues should be considered. In terms
of dynamics, a solid rotor provides considerable mechanical
advantages compared with other mechanical constructions
of the rotor. The mechanical advantages of a solid-rotor construction are based on the facts that the rotor does not contain
welded, friction, or compression joints and it consists of only
one part made of a single piece of material.
5.1 Properties of solid rotor
As solid rotors are machined from one piece of steel bar,
the structure is straightforward to balance out. It is noteworthy that in the case of a solid rotor, balancing does not have
to be reproduced during the lifetime of the solid rotor, as
may be the case with alternative structures. The solid rotor
does not contain many mechanical parts such as steel laminations, which makes it difficult to evaluate the stiffness
and damping properties of the rotor. The capability of steel
laminations to carry shear and bending loading is usually
low, and it depends on the assembly procedure. For example, Garvey et al. [11] concluded that for laminated stacks, the
Young’s modulus values for axial extension-compression are
in the order of 0.8×109 N/m2 , and the shear modulus values
are in the order of 0.3×109 N/m2 . In addition, a wide range
of effective moduli can be obtained with different clamping
pressures and surface treatments of individual laminations.
As a result, the mechanical properties of apparently similar
laminated rotors may vary. This, in turn, forces designers
to use large safety factors in order to avoid dynamic problems resulting from operation close to natural frequencies
of the rotor. Solid rotors equipped with a squirrel cage are
mechanically robust compared with laminated squirrel cage
rotors. However, in squirrel cage solid rotors, two materials,
viz. steel and copper, are jointed together. These mechanical joints are loaded by centrifugal inertial forces resulting
from different material densities and thermal loading caused
123
Fig. 12 Finite element model used in determining the effect of slitting
to the torsion stiffness of the solid rotor. The outer diameter of the rotor
is 313 mm and the diameter of the non-slitted cross-section is 193 mm
by different coefficients of thermal expansion of steel and
copper. For this reason, a high-quality joining process is
needed when squirrel cage solid rotors are manufactured.
Although purely solid rotors do not suffer from mechanical disadvantages similarly as laminated or squirrel gage
solid rotors, the slitting of the rotor in order to improve
the flux penetration will decrease the mechanical properties of the rotor. In practice, the rotor design is a trade-off
between the electromagnetic and the mechanical properties
of the rotor.The mechanical drawbacks of slitting are related
to the decreased torsion stiffness and increased vulnerability
to fatigue damage. The slitting of the rotor produces geometrical discontinuities, i.e. notches in which a significant stress
concentration can occur. As a result, notches can be places
of fatigue crack initiation, and subsequent crack propagation can cause severe damage to the structural component.
The largest cyclic stresses in a high-speed rotor are caused
by changes in the rotational speed. The major stress variation is caused during a run-up from standstill to the maximum rotation speed of the motor. In addition, variable-speed
motors may experience smaller stress cycles when the rotation speed is controlled to achieve an optimal process performance [8]. The torsional stiffness of the slitted rotor is
considerably lower compared with a smooth solid rotor. The
polar moment of inertia J that describes the ability to resist
torsion can be calculated for solid circular cross sections as
follows
π Dr4
,
(18)
32
where Dr is the diameter of the rotor. The torsion stiffness of
a slitted rotor can be studied using a detailed finite element
model, as shown in Fig. 12. In the rotor depicted in Fig. 12,
the effective diameter in terms of polar moment of inertia is
J=
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
about 108% of the diameter of the non-slitted cross section
of the rotor. In other words, the torsion stiffness of the slitted rotor in Fig. 12 is 19.7% of the torsion stiffness of an
equal-sized non-slitted solid rotor. In practice, these issues
suggest that the designer should use the diameter of the nonslitted cross-section of the rotor when evaluating the torsion
stiffness of the solid rotor.
Fastening a thin smooth ferromagnetic layer on the slitted rotor surface restores the torsional stiffness of the rotor.
Analytical methods for determining the torsion stiffness of a
slitted rotor are not straightforward. In practice, the designer
should use the finite element method for reliable torsional
stiffness evaluation. However, the effect of coating on the
torsion stiffness of the rotor can be estimated analytically.
The polar moment of inertia of coating, i.e. a thin-walled
tube, can be evaluated as follows
4
4
− Din
π Dout
,
(19)
Jp =
32
where Dout is the outer diameter and din is the inner diameter
of the tube, respectively. If the rotor in Fig. 12 is coated with
a 3 mm thick steel plate in such a way that Dout = 313 mm
and din = 307 mm, the torsion stiffness of the rotor increases
by 62% compared with a non-coated rotor. This is because
the polar moments of inertia of the slitted rotor and the coat
can be added together. It is noteworthy that a detailed finite
element calculation indicates even a 100% increase in the
torsion stiffness when the coating is carefully welded to the
rotor. Accordingly, the fastening method of the coating has
a significant effect on the torsional stiffness. For example, if
the coating is fastened by laser welding, in which the weld
is narrow, the stiffening effect of the coating is significantly
lower than in the case of a fully welded coating. Therefore,
the designer should use analytically obtained values from
(18) and (19) since the obtained torsion stiffness values are
lower than in reality, i.e. the results are always on the safe
side.
5.2 Bearing arrangements
The selection of the bearing arrangement of a solid-rotor
motor can be made in various ways. As solid rotors are connected to impellers without a gear, the bearing arrangement
must support the weight of the rotor and the impellers. The
impellers can be connected to the rotor using a rigid shaft
hub coupling such as a conical sleeve or tapered press. In
most practical cases, machines contain two impellers, one
at both ends of the shaft. However, it is possible to make a
compressor with one impeller only. This will affect the bearing arrangement design, since the impeller causes an axial
force that is directed outwards. This axial force is almost
compensated in two-sided impeller applications, whereas in
45
one-sided impeller applications the force must be compensated by the bearings of the motor.
The suitable bearing type depends on the size and the
operating conditions of the motor. Usually, in motors with a
rated power below 2 MW and operating speeds below 15,000
min−1 the rotors can be supported with oil-lubricated ball
or spindle bearings. Tilting pad journal bearings can be an
appropriate choice when the weight of the rotor becomes
considerable. The drawback of the journal bearings is their
larger frictional losses compared with rolling element bearings. However, in larger units, the rated power of which
is above 2 MW, the percentile losses become insignificant.
A benefit of journal bearings is their larger damping capability, which makes it possible to design a motor that operates
above its first critical speed. A possible alternative for the
bearings of a solid-rotor motor could be spindle bearings
equipped with squeeze film dampers (SFD). In SFD applications, the outer ring of the rolling element bearing can move
radially in a cap filled with oil. The oil film between the nonrotating surfaces provides damping in the radial direction
without large frictional losses of journal bearings.
The area of active magnetic bearings (AMBs) has
recently been intensively developed because this non-contact support system has numerous advantages compared with
conventional bearings. The most important advantages are
almost non-existent friction and consequently, a low energy
loss, no need for lubrication, quiet operation, and adjustable
stiffness and damping, which makes accurate rotor positioning possible. In addition, AMBs offer almost unlimited control over the rotor that they support. Adjustable stiffness and
damping are helpful especially from the mechanical point
of view. Adjustable stiffness of the AMB makes it possible
to decrease the natural frequencies of the rigid body modes
of the rotor under the operation speed, while the damping
coefficient can be increased. As a consequence, the vibration
at the natural frequency of the rigid body damps out, and
the motor can be used at supercritical speeds. Furthermore,
unbalance compensation during motor operation is possible because of the active feedback control of AMB. In the
unbalance compensation, the rotor does not rotate around
its geometrical centre but rotates around the centre of mass.
It is obvious that this is not possible when using mechanical bearings. Typically, an AMB application is expensive
and unique owing to the high expense associated with the
development of control software. However, because of their
numerous advantages, AMBs are an appropriate choice for
large-scale solid-rotor motors, the rated power of which is
several megawatts. Further, improved materials, strategies
of the controller, and electric components are enhancing the
performance and reliability of AMB. Despite this, additional
bearings, i.e. retainer bearings, have a vital role in the AMB
applications.
123
46
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
Fig. 13 Schematic diagram of
a rotor with two impellers. The
finite element node numbers are
shown above the centre line.
The slitted part of the rotor is
between nodes 10 and 13. The
dimensions are in millimetres
5.3 Rotor dynamics of solid-rotor motor
Rotor dynamic analysis constitutes a crucial part in the design
of a high-speed solid-rotor motor. Natural frequencies of the
rotor system as well as vibration responses caused by excitation forces have to be determined. It is important to point out
that both experimental and analytical methods should be utilized in the rotor dynamic analysis. In general, the following
analysis should be performed for a solid-rotor motor. First,
the free-free vibration modes, i.e. unsupported modes should
be determined for the rotor-impeller assembly. This can be
accomplished using the finite element method. The obtained
results should be verified with experimental modal analysis. Uncertain model parameters such as the stiffness of the
impeller attachment to the rotor can be determined using
experimentally obtained results.
The second step in the rotor dynamic analysis is the evaluation of critical speeds of the rotor bearing system. It is
important to note that because of the gyroscopic effects and
speed-dependent dynamic coefficients of the bearings, the
natural frequencies of the rotating shaft depend on the angular velocity. In general, the natural frequencies of the rotor
bearing system can be divided into backward whirling modes
(BW) and forward whirling (FW) modes. In the case of the
BW mode, the rotor whirling direction is opposite to the
rotor rotation direction, while in the FW mode the whirling
direction is the same as the rotor rotation direction. Usually the natural frequency of the BW mode decreases as
the rotation speed increases. Correspondingly, the natural
frequency of the FW mode increases as the rotation speed
increases. A critical speed occurs when a natural frequency
of the rotor bearing system coincides with the rotating speed
of the rotor. A Campbell diagram, where the natural frequencies of the rotor-bearing system are shown as a function of
rotation speed, is a useful tool in finding the critical speeds of
the rotor bearing system. Usually, critical speeds are excited
by unbalance forces that affect the rotor. It is important to
note that not all vibration modes are excited by unbalance.
123
For example, if bearing stiffnesses are symmetrical in two
radial directions, unbalance forces cannot excite the backward whirling modes. Normally, a third step in the analysis
is the calculation of the steady state responses caused by
exciting forces, such as rotor residual unbalance. In this step,
the rotor dynamic designer should use his or hers judgment
to ensure that the vibration responses are in an acceptable
level in the whole operating speed range. If any problems
are found, necessary modifications to the design should be
made and the analysis should be repeated until a satisfactory
solution is found.
As an example of the rotor dynamic analysis of a solidrotor motor, a structure shown in Fig. 13 is studied. The solidrotor with two impellers is modelled using shear deformable
beam finite elements. Only lateral degrees-of-freedom of the
rotor are taken into account in the analysis, i.e. longitudinal
and torsion vibrations are not studied. The analysis is accomplished in MatlabTM software [12] employing the general
rotor dynamic theory presented in [13–15]. The rotor is supported by two ball bearings that have different stiffness and
damping coefficients in two radial directions (y and z). The
impellers are modelled as rigid disks that are attached to the
shaft using translational and rotational springs. In addition,
the centre of gravity of both impellers is located at a distance
of 65 mm from the impeller attachment to the shaft. The rotor
is horizontally mounted, and gravity affects in the negative
z-direction (g = 9.81 m/s2 ). The total mass of the rotor with
impellers is 155.2 kg. The parameters used in the modelling
are shown in Table 6.
The Campbell diagram of the studied rotor is shown in
Fig. 14. Four critical speeds can be seen at the points where
the rotation speed and the natural frequencies intersect.
Figure 15 shows the steady-state unbalance responses of the
rotor-bearing system. We can see that the critical speed of
BW mode at 8,350 min−1 is slightly excited. The reason for
this is that the bearing stiffnesses are asymmetrical. In reality this phenomenon can take a place if the ball bearings are
not properly preloaded. However, this first critical speed may
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
47
Table 6 Parameters used in the rotor dynamic analysis of the solid-rotor
motor shown in Fig. 13
Young’s modulus of the rotor
210,000 MPa
Material density of the rotor
7,800 kg/m3
Poisson’s ratio of the rotor
0.3
Properties of the slitted part of the rotor
Area
0.0251 m2
Second moment of area, I yy , Izz
6.2832 × 10−5 m4
Bearing stiffness coefficients
Horizontal kby
Vertical kbz
Bearing damping coefficients
1.9 × 108 N/m
2.1 × 108 N/m
Horizontal cby
4,750 Ns/m
Vertical cbz
5,250 Ns/m
Impeller mass properties
Mass
19.0 kg
Polar mass moment of inertia
0.5 kg m2
Diametral mass moment of inertia
0.3 kg m2
Stiffness of impeller attachment
Translational
Rotational
Rotor unbalance masses
1.0 × 1011 N/m
not cause problems because the calculated response is small,
and even slight damping will diminish it. The first dangerous
critical speed is that of the FW mode at 12,950 min−1 . If a
20% safety margin is adopted, the rotor could be operating
up to a rotation speed of 10,300 min−1 . It can also be seen
that the third BW mode at 13,500 min−1 is excited because
of the asymmetrical support of the rotor. Figure 16 shows the
whirling modes of the rotor at critical speeds.
The analysis example above clarified the phases in the
rotor dynamic analysis that should be carried out in the design
phase of a new solid-rotor motor. It is noteworthy, however,
that a computer simulation should not be used as the only tool
in the design process. Vibration measurements are an essential part of the product development, and they should be used
in parallel with the modelling approach. Physical rotors may
contain several parameters that cannot be evaluated without experimental measurements. For example, the determination of the parameters of the rotor’s supporting structure
usually requires measurements. The rotor dynamics model
can then be updated and tuned with the help of experimentally obtained results.
1.5 × 106 Nm/rad
D1 Impeller (node 23)
36 g mm @ 270◦
D1 Rotor end (node 9)
50 g mm @ 0◦
D2 Rotor end (node 14)
50 g mm @ 0◦
D2 Impeller (node 24)
36 g mm @ 90◦
6 Conclusions
Large impellers in the applications of gas compressors, vacuum systems, and waste-water treatment systems can be
Fig. 14 Campbell diagram of
the studied solid-rotor motor
123
48
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
Fig. 15 Steady-state unbalance
response of the studied
solid-rotor motor with two
impellers
Fig. 16 Rotor whirling modes
that are excited at critical speeds
shown in Fig. 15. a–d Show the
whirling motion of the rotor
centre line. a Second BW mode
at 8,350 min−1 , f = 139.1 Hz,
ξ = 0.16%, b firs FW mode at
12,950 min−1 , f = 215.8 Hz,
ξ = 1.4%, c third BW mode at
13,500 min−1 , f = 225.1 Hz,
ξ = 1.4%, d second FW mode at
16,650 min−1 , f = 277.2 Hz,
ξ = 1.4%, where f is frequency
and ξ damping factor of the
mode
operated by a solid-rotor motor. In these applications, the
impeller can be attached to the solid-rotor motor directly
without a gearbox or a flexible coupling. This paper explains
the main design principles behind the electrical and mechanical design of a solid-rotor motor.
The design of a solid-rotor motor is a multidisciplinary
problem, in which the electrical, thermal, and mechanical
design aspects should simultaneously be taken into account.
In practice, this can be accomplished by extensively using
computer simulations. Computer simulations can serve as
123
a communication media within a multidisciplinary product
development team.
References
1. Arkkio A, Jokinen T, Lantto E (2005) Induction and permanentmagnet synchronous machines for high-speed applications. In:
Proceedings of the eighth international conference on electrical
machines and systems, vol 2, Nanjing, China, pp 871–876
2. Bumby JR, Spooner E, Dellora G, Gstrein W, Sutter H, Tennant H,
Wagner J (2004) Electrical machines for use in electronically
Electr Eng (2009) 91:35–49
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
assisted turbo-chargers. In: Proceedings of IEE conference on
power electronics, machines and drives, Edinburgh, UK, pp 344–
349
Binder A, Schneider T, Klohr M (2006) Fixation of buried and
surface-mounted magnets in high-speed permanent-magnet synchronous machines. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 42(4):1031–1037
Agarwal PD (1959) Eddy-current losses in solid and laminated
iron. Proc AIEE 42(1):169–181
Aho T, Sihvo V, Nerg J, Pyrhönen J (2007) Rotor materials for
medium-speed solid-rotor induction motors. In: Proceedings of
IEEE conference on electric machines and drives IEMDC, vol 1,
Antalaya, Turkey, pp 525–530
Russel R, Norsworthy K (1958) Eddy current and wall losses in
screened induction motors. Proc IEE 105(20):163–173
Heck C (1974) Magnetic materials and their applications. Butterworth, London
Aho T, Nerg J, Sopanen J, Huppunen J, Pyrhönen J (2006) Analyzing the effect of the rotor slit depth on the electric and mechanical
performance of a solid-rotor induction motor. Int Rev Electr Eng
(IREE) 1(4):516–524
49
9. Saari J (1998) Thermal analysis of high-speed induction machines,
Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica. Electrical Engineering Series no.
90, Diss. HUT, Espoo, Finland
10. Nerg J, Rilla M, Pyrhönen J (2008) Thermal analysis of radial-flux
electrical machines with a high power density. In: IEEE Trans. Ind
Electron 55(10):3543–3554
11. Garvey SD, Penny JET, Friswell MI, Lees AW (2004) The stiffening effect of laminated rotor cores on flexible-rotor electrical
machines. In: Proceedings of the eighth international conference
on vibrations in rotating machinery, Swansea, UK, pp 193–202
12. MATLAB Help (2003) Program manual (electric), version 6.5,
Mathworks Inc
13. Chen WJ, Gunter EJ (2005) Introduction to dynamics of
rotor-bearing systems. Trafford Publishing, Victoria
14. Krämer E (1993) Dynamics of rotors and foundation. Spinger,
Berlin
15. Lalanne M, Ferraris G (1998) Rotordynamics prediction in
engineering, 2nd edn. Wiley, West Sussex
123